Isocyanate Urethane Replacements on Structural Steel
POC: Pattie Lewis Burford, NASA TEERM Principal Center (321-867-9163)
pattie.l.lewis@nasa.gov
Background NASA and Air Force Space
Command widely use paints containing aliphatic isocyanates on structural and
non-structural elements in both shuttle and non-shuttle programs. Due to the
toxicity of isocyanates, these paints are hazardous to workers and the painting
operations are regulated under Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
National Institute for Occupation Safety and Health, and American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Alternative coatings that do not contain
isocyanates, but meet our performance requirements are desired.
Objective Validate
alternatives to aliphatic isocyanate urethane coatings for
structural steel. Successful completion of
this project will result in one or more materials being qualified for use on
support equipment, launch structures, test stands, ranges, and any other carbon
steel structures at NASA and Air Force Space Command.
Period of Performance
Stakeholders
Kennedy Space Center, Stennis Space Center and Air Force Space Command
Benefits
- Eliminates environmental, safety, and health risks associated with isocyanates
- Reduces environmental, safety, and health risks associated with use of coatings with high volatile organic content,
hazardous air pollutants, and other hazardous materials.
Document Status
- Project Summary Plan – Complete
- Joint Test Protocol – Complete
- Field Test Plan – Complete
- SSC Isocyanate Hazard Control Plan – Complete
- Potential Alternatives Report – Complete
- Draft Joint Test Report – Complete
- Draft Cost-Benefit Analysis – Complete
- Final Joint Test Report – Complete
- Final Cost-Benefit Analysis – Complete
Recent Progress
- Based on the results of the testing, five alternative coatings systems were
approved for Qualified Products List in the NASA technical
standard NASA-STD-5008A, Protective Coatings of Carbon Steel, Stainless
Steel, and Aluminum on Launch Structures, Facilities, and Ground Support
Equipment (currently under revision).
Milestones
- Kicked off project – July 2003
- Completed Project Summary Plan – August 2003
- Completed Joint Test Protocol – January 2005
- Completed Field Test Plan – January 2005
- Completed SSC Isocyanate Hazard Control Plan – July 2005
- Completed Potential Alternatives Report – May 2006
- Completed Phase 1 testing – December 2005
- The results were reviewed and four of the eight coating system
alternatives performed well enough to continue to Phase 2
- Phase 1 testing requirements are shown in the table below
|
Phase 1 Testing Requirements for
Alternatives to Isocyanate Urethanes Project |
|
Test |
Test
Methodology |
AF Requirement |
NASA Requirement |
|
Pot Life (Viscosity) |
ASTM D 1200 |
X |
X |
|
Ease of Application
(including DFT) |
SSPC-PA-2 |
X |
X |
|
Surface Appearance
(including color and
gloss) |
ASTM D 523;
ASTM D 2244 |
X |
X |
|
Dry-To-Touch (Sanding) |
None |
X |
X |
|
Accelerated Storage
Stability |
ASTM D 1849 |
X |
X |
|
Cure Time (MEK Solvent
Rub) |
ASTM D 4752 |
X |
X |
|
Solvent (Acetone) Rub |
ASTM D 4752 |
|
X |
|
Cleanability |
MIL-PRF-83282 D; MIL-PRF-85285 |
|
X |
|
X-Cut Adhesion by Wet
Tape |
ASTM D 3359;
FED-STD-141 |
X |
X |
|
Tensile (Pull-off)
Adhesion |
ASTM D 4541 |
X |
X |
|
Knife Test |
FED-STD-141 |
X |
|
- Completed Phase 2 testing – January 2007
- Four alternative coating systems were carried on to Phase 2
- Phase 2 testing requirements are shown in the table below
|
Phase 2 Testing Requirements for
Alternatives to Isocyanate Urethanes Project |
|
Test |
Test
Methodology |
AF Requirement |
NASA Requirement |
|
Removability |
ASTM G 155 |
X |
X |
|
Repairability |
ASTM D 523; ASTM D 2244; ASTM D 3359 |
X |
X |
|
Abrasion Resistance |
ASTM D 4060 |
|
X |
|
Gravelometer |
ASTM D 3170 |
X |
|
|
Fungus Resistance |
ASTM D 3359; MIL-STD-810 F |
|
X |
|
Accelerated Weathering |
ASTM D 523; ASTM D 2244; ASTM G 155 |
X |
X |
|
Mandrel Bend Flexibility |
ASTM D 522 |
X |
|
|
18-Month Marine Environment |
ASTM D 610; ASTM D 714; ASTM D 523 |
X |
X |
|
Cyclic Corrosion Resistance |
GM 4465 P; GM 9540 P |
X |
X |
|
Hypergol Compatibility |
KSC MTB-175-88; NASA-STD-6001 |
X |
X |
|
LOX Compatibility |
ASTM D 2512; NASA-STD-6001 |
|
X |
Completed Field testing at Stennis Space Center - September 2006
- All eight alternative systems and two control coatings were applied to an
engine test stand at Stennis Space Center, Mississippi
- The coatings were evaluated at 6 and 12 months
- Field testing requirements are shown in the table below
|
Field Testing Requirements for
Alternatives to Isocyanate Urethanes Project |
|
Test |
Test
Methodology |
AF Requirement |
NASA Requirement |
|
Ease of Application (including DFT) |
SSPC-PA-2 |
X |
X |
|
Surface Appearance (including color retention and gloss) |
ASTM D 523; ASTM D 2244 |
X |
X |
|
Dry-To-Touch (Sanding) |
None |
X |
X |
The results from this project were incorporated into the
Low VOC Coatings and Depainting Technologies Field Testing Phase 2
(http://www.teerm.nasa.gov/projects/LowVOCCoatings_DepaintingTechFieldTestPh2.html)
project – January 2007
Briefed project at the Air Force Corrosion Conference in Macon, GA - March
2007
Distributed Final Joint Test Report – August 2007
Distributed Final Cost-Benefit Analysis
– October 2007
Near-Term Goals
- Assist in implementation of technologies at Stennis Space Center, other NASA
Centers, and Air Force Space Command
- Brief the 18-month Marine Exposure Testing at the 2008 NACE Corrosion Conference – March 2008
+
Reports
Printer Friendly Version
|