Skip all navigation and jump to content Jump to site navigation Jump to section navigation.
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration

+ Visit NASA.gov
Go
TEERM Logo
HOME OVERVIEW PROJECTS REPORTS WORKSHOP EVENTS TEAM LINKS

  +Home

 

Events
ACTIVE
COMPLETED
DEVELOPING
TEERM Active Project

Low VOC Coatings and Depainting Technologies Field Testing Phase 2

POC: Pattie Lewis, NASA TEERM Principal Center (321-867-9163) pattie.l.lewis@nasa.gov
                 
Background
There are various federal and state regulations regarding the amount of VOCs that an installation can emit.  In order to meet these guidelines, more environmentally friendly coatings have been developed.  While these coatings meet environmental requirements, they must be validated to the stringent performance requirements of Air Force Space Command and NASA.

Air Force Space Command and NASA also currently use abrasive blasting for surface preparation/depainting of structural steel which creates fine, airborne dust.  Such operations are regulated under the Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, National Institute for Occupation Safety and Health, and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.

This project is a continuation of various Air Force Space Command and NASA work including:

Objective
This effort is to demonstrate/validate environmentally preferable (low-VOC, non-hazardous) coatings and depainting technologies.  Successful completion of this project will result in one or more materials/processes being qualified for use on support equipment, launch structures, test stands, ranges, and any other carbon steel structures at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and Kennedy Space Center, Florida. 

Period of Performance

  • Oct-06 to Apr-09.

Stakeholders
Kennedy Space Center, Air Force 45th Space Wing and Headquarters Air Force Space Command.

Benefits

  • Reduces environmental, safety, and health risks with use of paints and coatings of high VOC content.
  • Reduces environmental, safety, and health risks with use of depainting media.
  • Reduced material obsolescence risks.
  • Findings applicable to both NASA and AFSPC.

Document Status

  • Project Management Plan – Complete.
  • Field Demonstration Plan – Complete.

Recent Progress

  • Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Fixed Umbilical Tower after launch of a GPS satellite – March 2008.
    • Temperature sensitive liquids were applied to determine what temperature ranges the coatings experienced.
    • The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or penetration to the substrate.
    • Based on the evaluation, it was decided to that the thermal spray coatings could be left on the Fixed Umbilical Tower and exposed to a third launch.

Milestones

  • Completed Project Management Plan, Work Breakdown Structure, and Schedule – October 2006.
  • Completed Field Demonstration Plan – January 2007.
    • Testing locations were identified at Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.
    • Depainting and coating alternatives identified by TEERM and Air Force Space Command.
      • One liquid coating system was selected based on its performance in the Alternatives to Aliphatic Isocyanate Urethanes for Structural Steel project.
      • Two liquid coatings systems were selected based on their performance in previous Air Force Space Command studies.
      • The topcoat for the Thermal Spray Coatings tested was selected based on its performance in the Alternatives to Aliphatic Isocyanate Urethanes for Structural Steel project.
      • The Thermal Spray Coatings were selected based on their performance in previous Air Force Space Command studies and field experience.
      • The ablative alternative was selected based on its performance on other Kennedy Space Center structures.
    • Testing requirements were identified:
      • Field Evaluation Requirements for Surface Preparation/Depainting Technologies are shown in the table below.

Field Evaluation Requirements for Surface Preparation/

Depainting Technologies

Test

Acceptance Criteria

Test Method References

Ease of Use

To be assessed by project engineers and stakeholders

None

Coating Strip Rate

1.7 ft2/min at 6 mil thickness or equivalent

None

SSPC Surface Cleaning Level

Concurrence that technology meets agreed upon cleaning level using visual determination using SSPC Surface cards at 10X magnification

SSPC-SP-10 (5)/

NACE-NO. 2;

SSPC-VIS-1

Surface Profile/ Roughness

Concurrence that technology meets agreed upon surface profile using visual determination

NACE-STD-RP0287

Waste Generation

Less than current abrasive blasting techniques

None

Particulate Generation

Less than current abrasive blasting techniques

None

Coating Removal Damage Appraisal

No warping/denting or metal erosion observable at 10X magnification

None

  • Field Evaluation Requirements for Low VOC Coating Alternatives are shown in the table below.

Field Evaluation Requirements for Low VOC Coating Alternatives

Test

Acceptance Criteria

Test Method References

Ease of Application

Smooth coat, with acceptable appearance, no runs, bubbles or sags; Record Pot Life, DFT and associated issues

SSPC-PA-2

Surface Appearance

Rust Grade Assessment equal to or better than control

No streaks, blistering, voids, air bubbles, cratering, lifting, blushing, or other surface defects/ irregularities; No micro-cracks observable at 10X magnification

ASTM D 610;

ASTM D 714;

ASTM D 2244;

ASTM D 523

Tensile (Pull-off) Adhesion

Pull-off strength achieved at time of failure equal to or better than control coatings

ASTM D 4541

  • Conducted field demonstration at Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL – January 2007.
    • Three depainting alternatives were demonstrated—two media and a blast and vacuum system.
    • Two thermal spray coatings and an alternative ablative coating were applied to areas on the Fixed Umbilical Tower in areas where they will be subjected to the extreme heat and exhaust experienced during a launch.
    • The two thermal spray coatings and three liquid coating systems were applied to an area on the Mobile Support Tower where they will be evaluated at 6-, 12-, and 18-month intervals.
  • Conducted six-month evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Mobile Support Tower – July 2007.
    • All six coating systems are performing well with no signs of corrosion present.
    • The next evaluation is at the 12-month interval.
  • Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Fixed Umbilical Tower after launch of the “Phoenix” mission launch – August 2007.
    • The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or penetration to the substrate.
    • Post-launch adhesion testing was performed and compared to pre-launch results for the thermal spray coatings.
    • Temperature sensitive liquids were applied to determine what temperature ranges the coatings experienced.
    • The ablative coating alternative performed as expected, but it was determined that a thicker layer than that applied during this demonstration is required.
    • It was decided to leave the thermal spray coatings on the Fixed Umbilical Tower to be exposed to a second launch.
  • Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Fixed Umbilical Tower after launch of a GPS satellite – October 2007.
    • The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or penetration to the substrate.
    • Based on the evaluation, it was decided to that the thermal spray coatings could be left on the Fixed Umbilical Tower and exposed to a third launch.
  • Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Fixed Umbilical Tower after launch of a GPS satellite – December 2007.
    • Temperature sensitive liquids were applied to determine what temperature ranges the coatings experienced.
    • The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or penetration to the substrate.
    • Based on the evaluation, it was decided to that the thermal spray coatings could be left on the Fixed Umbilical Tower and exposed to a fourth launch.
  • Conducted 12-month evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Mobile Support Tower – March 2008.
    • All six coating systems are performing well with no signs of corrosion present.
    • Color and Gloss Retention measurements were also taken.
    • The next evaluation will be in six months – September 2008.

Near-Term Goals

  • Evaluate coatings placed on Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Mobile Support Tower at 18-month interval – September 2008.
  • Evaluate coatings placed on Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Fixed Umbilical Tower after fifth launch – Fall 2008.

+ Reports

Printer Friendly Version
FirstGov logo + Privacy Policy and Important Notices NASA Curator: Cassandra Carroll
NASA Official: Chuck Griffin
Last Updated: 07/25/2008