|
Low VOC Coatings and Depainting Technologies Field
Testing Phase 2
POC: Pattie Lewis, NASA TEERM Principal Center (321-867-9163) pattie.l.lewis@nasa.gov
Background
There are various federal and state regulations regarding
the amount of VOCs that an installation can emit. In order to meet these
guidelines, more environmentally friendly coatings have been developed. While
these coatings meet environmental requirements, they must be validated to the
stringent performance requirements of Air Force Space Command and NASA.
Air Force Space Command and NASA also currently use
abrasive blasting for surface preparation/depainting of structural steel which
creates fine, airborne dust. Such operations are regulated under the
Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, National Institute for Occupation
Safety and Health, and American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists.
This project is a continuation of various Air Force Space
Command and NASA work including:
Objective
This effort is to demonstrate/validate environmentally preferable (low-VOC, non-hazardous) coatings and depainting
technologies. Successful completion of this project will result in one or more
materials/processes being qualified for use on support equipment, launch
structures, test stands, ranges, and any other carbon steel structures at Cape
Canaveral Air Force Station and Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
Period of Performance
Stakeholders
Kennedy Space Center, Air Force 45th Space Wing and
Headquarters Air Force Space Command.
Benefits
- Reduces environmental, safety, and health risks with use of paints
and coatings of high VOC content.
- Reduces environmental, safety, and health risks with use of depainting media.
- Reduced material obsolescence risks.
- Findings applicable to both NASA and AFSPC.
Document Status
- Project Management Plan – Complete.
- Field Demonstration Plan – Complete.
Recent Progress
- Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad
A, Fixed Umbilical Tower after launch of a GPS satellite – March 2008.
- Temperature sensitive liquids were applied to determine what temperature ranges
the coatings experienced.
- The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or
penetration to the substrate.
- Based on the evaluation, it was decided to that the thermal spray coatings
could be left on the Fixed Umbilical Tower and exposed to a third launch.
Milestones
- Completed Project Management Plan, Work Breakdown Structure, and
Schedule – October 2006.
- Completed Field
Demonstration Plan – January 2007.
- Testing locations were identified at Space Launch Complex 17, Pad
A, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.
- Depainting and coating alternatives identified by TEERM and Air
Force Space Command.
- One liquid coating system was selected based on its performance in the Alternatives to Aliphatic Isocyanate Urethanes for
Structural Steel project.
- Two liquid coatings systems were selected based on their performance in
previous Air Force Space Command studies.
- The topcoat for the Thermal Spray Coatings tested was selected based on its performance in the Alternatives to Aliphatic Isocyanate Urethanes for
Structural Steel project.
- The Thermal Spray Coatings were selected based on their
performance in previous Air Force Space Command studies and field experience.
- The ablative alternative was selected based on its performance on other Kennedy Space Center
structures.
- Testing requirements were identified:
- Field Evaluation Requirements for Surface Preparation/Depainting Technologies are
shown in the table below.
|
Field Evaluation Requirements for Surface Preparation/
Depainting Technologies |
|
Test |
Acceptance Criteria |
Test Method References |
|
Ease of Use |
To be assessed by project engineers and stakeholders |
None |
|
Coating Strip Rate |
1.7 ft2/min at 6 mil thickness or equivalent |
None |
|
SSPC Surface Cleaning Level |
Concurrence that technology meets agreed upon cleaning level using
visual determination using SSPC Surface cards at 10X magnification |
SSPC-SP-10 (5)/
NACE-NO.
2;
SSPC-VIS-1 |
|
Surface Profile/ Roughness |
Concurrence that
technology meets agreed upon surface profile using visual determination |
NACE-STD-RP0287 |
|
Waste Generation |
Less than current abrasive blasting techniques |
None |
|
Particulate Generation |
Less than current abrasive blasting techniques |
None |
|
Coating Removal Damage Appraisal |
No warping/denting or metal erosion observable at 10X magnification |
None |
|
Field Evaluation Requirements for Low VOC Coating Alternatives
|
|
Test |
Acceptance Criteria |
Test Method References |
|
Ease of Application |
Smooth coat, with acceptable appearance, no runs, bubbles or sags; Record
Pot Life, DFT and associated issues |
SSPC-PA-2 |
|
Surface Appearance |
Rust
Grade Assessment equal to or better than control
No
streaks, blistering, voids, air bubbles, cratering, lifting, blushing, or
other surface defects/ irregularities; No micro-cracks observable at 10X
magnification |
ASTM D 610;
ASTM D 714;
ASTM D 2244;
ASTM D 523 |
|
Tensile
(Pull-off) Adhesion |
Pull-off strength achieved at time of failure equal to or better than
control coatings |
ASTM D 4541 |
- Conducted field demonstration at Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A,
Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, FL – January 2007.
- Three depainting alternatives were demonstrated—two media and a
blast and vacuum system.
- Two thermal spray coatings and an alternative ablative coating were
applied to areas on the Fixed Umbilical Tower in areas where they will be
subjected to the extreme heat and exhaust experienced during a launch.
- The two thermal spray coatings and three liquid coating systems
were applied to an area on the Mobile Support Tower where they will be evaluated
at 6-, 12-, and 18-month intervals.
- Conducted six-month evaluation of coatings placed on the Space
Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Mobile Support Tower – July 2007.
- All six coating systems are performing well with no signs of
corrosion present.
- The next evaluation is at the 12-month interval.
- Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex
17, Pad A, Fixed Umbilical Tower after launch of the “Phoenix” mission launch –
August 2007.
- The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or
penetration to the substrate.
- Post-launch adhesion testing was performed and compared to
pre-launch results for the thermal spray coatings.
- Temperature sensitive liquids were applied to determine what temperature ranges
the coatings experienced.
- The ablative coating alternative performed as expected, but it was
determined that a thicker layer than that applied during this demonstration is
required.
- It was decided to leave the thermal spray coatings on the Fixed Umbilical Tower
to be exposed to a second launch.
- Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A, Fixed
Umbilical Tower after launch of a GPS satellite – October 2007.
- The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or penetration
to the substrate.
- Based on the evaluation, it was decided to that the thermal spray coatings could
be left on the Fixed Umbilical Tower and exposed to a third launch.
- Conducted evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A,
Fixed Umbilical Tower after launch of a GPS satellite – December 2007.
- Temperature sensitive liquids were applied to determine what temperature ranges
the coatings experienced.
- The thermal spray coatings were examined for any areas of damage or penetration
to the substrate.
- Based on the evaluation, it was decided to that the thermal spray coatings could
be left on the Fixed Umbilical Tower and exposed to a fourth launch.
- Conducted 12-month evaluation of coatings placed on the Space Launch Complex
17, Pad A,
Mobile Support Tower – March 2008.
- All six coating systems are performing well with no signs of corrosion
present.
- Color and Gloss Retention measurements were also taken.
- The next evaluation will be in six months – September 2008.
Near-Term Goals
- Evaluate coatings placed on Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A,
Mobile Support Tower at 18-month interval – September 2008.
- Evaluate coatings placed on Space Launch Complex 17, Pad A,
Fixed Umbilical Tower after fifth launch – Fall 2008.
+ Reports
Printer Friendly Version
|